A Second Facility When There Is Already a Debenture in Place

Where an existing lender holds a debenture and an assignment over your receivables but will not increase the limit, a second facility alongside it is usually possible, but not without the incumbent's agreement. Either the two lenders rank their claims over the same asset by deed of priority, or the second facility is secured on an asset the incumbent does not hold a fixed charge over and it releases or waives that. The obstacle is almost always commercial, not legal.

Start by asking the incumbent

Counter-intuitively, the first conversation is with the lender you are trying to work around. It needs to consent in most structures anyway, it may prefer to provide the additional facility itself, and its answer determines which of the routes below is actually open. Going to market first and discovering at the security stage that the incumbent will not rank is how these timetables get wasted.

The three routes, in order of how often they work

The mechanics, and the realistic timetable

The security documentation, not the credit decision, is what sets the date you can draw. Rather than repeat it here, the full process, who signs, the typical timescales, the costs and the things that most often delay or block it are set out in the deed of priority guide. If your facility was withdrawn rather than merely capped, start from the withdrawn facility hub instead, because the timetable there is driven by someone else's notice period.

A second facility alongside an existing debenture is usually possible, but needs the incumbent lender's agreement to rank or release its security. The obstacle is commercial, not legal. More detail + scope

This page covers

second invoice finance facility alongside an existing debenture: consent, ranking, asset separation, and why the incumbent is the first conversation

Not covered here

Deed of priority process, timescales and costs (see the deed of priority guide), withdrawn facilities (see /bank-exit/), pricing (see /guides/costs/)

AP

Adam Parker

Founder & Managing Director, Muswell Rose, founder and PSC of Best Business Loans Ltd

Adam is the founder and managing director of Muswell Rose and a founder of Best Business Loans Ltd, the company behind Market Invoice. He spent over three years as managing director of Penny, a UK invoice finance business, and his career runs through insurance, mortgages, commercial finance and fintech lending. He writes the Market Invoice library.

Last updated:

Get 3 Free Invoice Finance Quotes

Free, no obligation.

Step 1 of 3 · Your business

Start typing and we'll search Companies House.

Free to you: our introduction partner pays us a fixed fee for each introduction, whether or not you go ahead. See our privacy policy.

Free · No obligation · Nothing to pay us

How we make money: Market Invoice is an independent comparison service, not a lender. Our introduction partner pays us a fixed fee for each business we introduce, whether or not you go ahead; you never pay us and it is never added to your costs. How we are funded.

Second Facility FAQ

Can I take a second facility if my lender holds a debenture?

Often yes, but not unilaterally. The incumbent's debenture and its assignment of the receivables mean a second funder lending against the same ledger needs the position ranked or released, which requires the incumbent's agreement. Where the second facility is secured on a different asset the incumbent does not have a fixed charge over, consent is usually simpler. The question is rarely legal possibility; it is whether the incumbent will co-operate.

What does the incumbent actually have to agree to?

Either a deed of priority ranking the two lenders' claims over the same asset, or a release or waiver over the specific asset the new facility is secured on. Both are routine documents, and both depend on a commercial decision by the incumbent, which is why the answer often arrives faster if you ask them directly and early rather than through the new funder.

Why would my existing lender refuse?

Usually one of three reasons. It sees the new borrowing as increasing the risk to its own position. It would rather provide the additional facility itself, which is worth testing first. Or its own credit policy simply does not permit ranking behind or alongside another lender on that asset class. A refusal is a commercial answer, not a legal one, so it is worth understanding which of the three you are facing.

Is it better to add a second facility or replace the first?

It depends on what is actually constraining you. If the incumbent's pricing and service are fine and it is only the limit that is short, a second facility on a different asset can be cheaper and quicker than unwinding a working arrangement. If the incumbent is also expensive, slow or restrictive, replacing it usually costs less over the term than layering another facility on top of a bad one.

How long does the security side take?

The security negotiation, not the credit decision, is what sets the timetable, and it is the step where most switches and second facilities stall. The deed of priority guide sets out the process, who signs, the typical timescales and what delays it.